Why I Won't Let Party Labels Do the Talking for Me
There's a moment that happens in almost every political conversation these days, and it usually happens fast. You're talking to someone, maybe about taxes, maybe about the sewer system, maybe about their kid's school. The conversation is going well. Then somehow the topic of party comes up, and the second they hear the label, the conversation is over. "Oh, I'm not interested," they say, and that's it. Doesn't matter that thirty seconds earlier you two agreed on almost everything.
I talk about exactly this in my latest video, and it's something I say to my own party just as much as I'd say it to anyone else: I may run under a party's name, and I may represent it on a ballot line, but I was hired to represent the people of District 16, not the party itself.
Watch the full video here: Politics: People Over Parties, Not Tribalism! #shorts
This isn't a new problem, but it's gotten worse. Our politics have become so polarized that a party label now functions like a stop sign, cutting off a conversation before it even has the chance to get anywhere. That's a loss for everyone, because it means people are making decisions based on tribal identity instead of what a candidate will actually do once they're in office.
I'd rather earn your vote based on how I show up for Yonkers, how I vote on developments, how hard I fight for sewer infrastructure, how I handle the county budget, than based on which letter happens to be printed next to my name. If we can get more people to have that two-minute conversation before the party label comes up, I think we'd all be a lot better off.
Dan D'Amico is running for Westchester County Legislature, District 16, representing Yonkers.
Comments